Matth.
3:13-17, 4:1-11. Feb. 19th, 1996.
At
the time of the first British Billy Graham Crusade in the ’50s a cartoon
appeared with a man carrying a placard saying “Christ is the Answer.” He was
closely followed by someone with a second one asking “What is the Question?”
In ‘66 when we moved to
Tonight
my subject is technically the classic one, that is sin, repentance and
preparation for Lent. Ash Wednesday is the time when we get our noses rubbed in
some sombre subjects. Having little time I am going to leave to you most of
the work of deciding whether you have made that decisive turn away from evil,
and are making those necessary daily and hourly turnings away from gross sin,
or little hidden untruths, dishonesties, cruelties, injustices and so on,
which repentance means. I shall also leave to you to decide what to take on or
renounce this Lent by way of discipline; this will vary with age, health, sex
and circumstances. I am going to zero in on what seems to me the missing piece
of the whole jigsaw. What IS the question?
We
have our forty days of Lent because of Jesus’ forty days in the desert. So I
invite you to follow Him there, and to think about the account which we have
just heard from what may seem a new angle. We have all heard sermons from the
viewpoint of spectators: the temptation of the Son of God was bound to be
unsuccessful; he could not ultimately have done otherwise, or swerved aside
from the hard way of proving his Messiahship. I think that it would help us to
go into the desert with a human being whose choices were made in time, as ours
are, were real to him at the time and who therefore might have chosen wrongly.
How does the power of evil operate, how must we deal with it and where is God
in the process?
The
word ‘devil’ (diabolos) means
‘accuser’. It is his nature to make a case which God and we must answer. He is
our implacable foe as the Holy Spirit is our friend, or counsel for the
defence. He is an objective reality. There is in this narrative a clinching refutation
of the modern view that our Enemy is just a primitive personification of the
dark underside of human nature, for here Jesus is all alone with that Enemy,
and Jesus by definition had no dark underside, no experience of evil interior
to himself. Talk about close encounters with alien beings... Another deduction
which may be made from the fact that the two of them are all alone is that
yielding to temptation means essentially offending God: it may or may not also
be an offence against human beings or other creatures. This entity both wills
and plans. It comes at us straight after a spiritual ‘high’ when we are emotionally
vulnerable. It is patient and persistent, keeping on for days on end. One must
suppose that it spent some time working its way through the easier ones before
the forty-day mark. As Luke says, and as we see from at least three later
episodes in the Gospels, it regrouped and tried again after this attempt. It,
or he, knows our weak points (in a warm climate after the first few days the
faster stops thinking about food, there is a long period when lucidity is at
its peak and starvation does not set in for at least five weeks. At about forty
days everything changes), and he saves the hardball for the psychological
moment. He is both more cunning and much stronger than any mere human. Only
God is stronger. He knows Scripture well and, beaten back with it, can quote it
for his own purpose. The dreams he invokes and the texts he slings are
carefully chosen to appeal to what we know of God. Only a little twist, a
little kink in the promise give away the corrupt intention. The first major
temptation [ch. 4, v. 3] aims to get Jesus to put something ahead of God.
Notice that the thing in question is perfectly all right in itself. “Come on
now, you deserve the best; you owe it to yourself; everybody’s doing it;
you’ve waited all this time; some Father to want you to starve...” The wrapping
is clever and appealing; it conceals both box and contents. The box is a
Chinese one: once opened, it will be found to contain another box, which
contains yet another. The second suggestion aims to get him to put himself and
his reputation ahead of God, with a fantasy about a spectacular miracle. The
third asks him to put the devil ahead of God: in return for his worshipping
God’s enemy, the whole world will become his, a promise whose fulfilment was
part of Messiah’s destiny. Luke makes this box no. 2, not no. 3; but before we
dismiss it as so blatant as to be naive, as though the devil were getting desperate,
let’s face the fact that anyone who had bought the first or second boxes would
have bought devil-worship into the bargain. NOT “trailing clouds of glory do
we come/From God who is our home”. Sin is in our bloodstream: the instant we
could walk across a room as tiny children and touch something we were forbidden
to touch we did it, and our dark underside where the devil reigns is well-developed.
Only because we live with self-deception do we imagine that we couldn’t fall
for that one, put to us quite nakedly. Of you and me it must be said that we
bought no. 3 inside 1 and 2 when we were quite small, and chose (as we all
remember) to sell out to evil.
Immediately
after Jesus was publicly endorsed by his Father as distinct in his sonship and
sinlessness [3:13-17], as Matthew states at the start of Ch. 4, it was the
Father’s purpose that Jesus was to be forced to confront evil head on [v. 1].
If we are to go with him, we should be mentally prepared for the same. The
Enemy of God and of all that is good will be allowed to make an attempt on us.
We are going to walk against a hurricane, swim against the tide. Step one is to
expect this. Then again, Jesus had no Bible or concordance in the desert;
rather he had been laying up the Word of God in his heart for at least three
decades. Jesus sent each of the recorded temptations flying so decisively that
we can be sure that he knew all of it by heart. We too should lay it up in
store, even the bits which just now ring no bells. There will be choices; we
must learn how to rip through seductive packaging. Jesus was fasting [v. 2].
One must assume that he chose to fast, as later he chose to refuse the drink
before his execution, and that this was so that he could keep a clear head. We
can’t afford to be sleepy. The devil is a very slick theologian: he specialises
in confusing us.
What
is God’s part in this? Does He send us out to face impossible odds, in effect
pushing us out ahead of Himself, and then falling back, leaving us exposed?
Where do grace and the Holy Spirit come in? Here we have to keep very clear
heads indeed. We are certainly promised that we shall not be forsaken. But it
is universal Christian experience that the felt presence of God is distinct
from the real presence. There is a very real sense in which discipline is
whatever equips us to stand firm when we have to practise what feels like His
absence. Such times may well become more frequent as we go on; they are part of
our growing through trials which only get harder. Perhaps Our Lord in the desert
felt his Father’s presence strongly; there is no sign that this was how it was
then, or in Gethsemane, or at the time of dereliction on the Cross. Of
myself I should testify that in the fiercest temptation that I have faced so
far God hid Himself, in my own vow made before Him, the simple word of a text
and the voice of conscience. Only when it was over did He beam upon me again.
Cast thy care on Jesus...
(581)
Grant, O Lord, that as we
are baptized into the death of thy blessed Son our Saviour Jesus Christ, so by
continually mortifying our corrupt affections we may be buried with him; and
that, through the grave, and gate of death, we may pass to our joyful resurrection;
for his merits, who died, and was buried, and rose again for us, thy Son, Jesus
Christ our Lord. AMEN.